Soul = Body + Spirit May 28, 2008
Dave wrote an excellent post on What Can’t Mormons Do? Part 2: The Law of Chastity. It helps me understand where LDS people are coming from with the Law of Chastity. But I just don’t get the overall picture. And I’m really trying to understand. I think it stems from fundamental differences in LDS and non-LDS thought.
(Dave, I’m not criticizing your post. I’m just trying to understand. And I don’t want to confuse anyone who is looking for basic LDS info at WhatDoMormonsBelieve by posting this in the comments section.)
I have grown up believing soul = spirit. But, according to Joseph Smith, soul = body + spirit (D&C 88). If Christ has saved our souls and they belong to him, and I would be the caretaker of my soul. If I take good care of my soul than it will return to Christ. Or maybe I should think of it more like a rental contract. I may use my body to house my spirit and the Holy Ghost but the contract says that the body cannot engage in sex before marriage. And if I obey the terms of the rental contract, then eventually the body will become my own at the resurrection. But that’s not even true because everyone (except a very small few) will be resurrected and united with their physical body. The difference in the kingdoms of heaven doesn’t have to do with what type of body we get back because we all get back our own bodies. The difference is what level we end up in and thus that makes a difference to our spirits.
This is a common argument as well and the one presented to me by the missionaries: Sexual intimacy can create life, and thus it is a sacred act similar to partaking the sacrament. But what about when it doesn’t create life - for example when barrier methods or birth control methods are used? Is it wrong to have sex when using birth control? More problems arise if the answer is no. Since sex is sacred because cause the creation of life, then it follows that sex is not sacred when it does not/ cannot cause the creation of life. If having sex is a sacred act, then why must it occur within the bonds of marriage? Marriage is sacred so then a sacred act like sex can only happen within marriage?
Maybe I have difficulty claiming that my body is sacred because it is so messed up. It doesn’t function properly. I have had random benign tumors inside of me. Without medication I am depressed for 8 out of 12 months of a year. I suffered with horrible acne for years as a teen. It is hard to view my body as sacred when it causes me so much pain. Or maybe I don’t view sex as sacred. Creating a child is sacred, but sex isn’t always.
I have a hard time understanding why God would command us not to have sex before marriage. I honestly think He doesn’t really care. How can it rank slightly below murder and denying the Holy Ghost? I feel like stealing, being abusive/harming someone, and selling drugs (among many other sins) ranks above sex before marriage. I think God cares if we did stupid things like get drunk and have a one night stand. Or have sex outside of marriage without protection. But how is it harmful to have sex within a loving, committed relationship where you accept all of the potential consequences of your actions including possible physical or emotional harm?
Obviously I’m very confused. Can anyone help me out? Why am I so confused? It seems so simple to those who have grown up in the LDS faith. Currently “because God said so” is my only reason for obeying the Law of Chastity, but I’d like to add some other reasons too.

